Rus

 

«DECISION-MAKING ISSUES»

STATE NATURE RESERVE FINANCING IN 2001: SUMMARY

The records of state nature reserves under the Russian Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) show that the total budget in 2001 for the entire system of reserves amounted to 348,192,000 rubles* (versus 265,223,000 rubles in 2000) and came from various sources (see Table 1).

Table 1. Sources of financing for MNR state nature reserves in 2001 and 2000

Sources
of Financing

2001

2000

Change in Share of Financing Source

Growth
of Financing Source,
%

Total, thousand rubles
Share
of Source, %
Total, thousand rubles
Share
of Source, %
Federal budget, including State Ecology Fund

232 640

66,8

130 281

49,1

+17,7

+ 79

Regional & local budgets;
non- budgetary funds

43 949

12,6

40 036

15,1

- 2,5

+ 10

Foreign grants

40 241

11,6

66 120

24,9

-13,3

- 39

Reserve earnings

26 096

7,5

21 004

8,0

– 0,5

+24

Russian grants

5 266

1,5

7782

2,9

- 1,4

-32

TOTAL

348 192

100

265 223

100

0

+ 31

For the structure of the reserves' own earnings, see Table 2.

Table 2. Structure of state nature reserves' own earnings in 2001 (versus in 2000)

Item of Income

Sum,
in rubles

Revenues from visitor service

7112 (5713)

Revenues from timber felling and sales of timber and timber products

1401 (629)

Revenues from other types of exploitation permissible in reserves and their buffer zones
(including transit fees)

1721 (1929)

Collected fines, claims, realization of property forfeited to the State

3152 (2960)

Contractual research work (not paid for out of the federal budget)

5820 (5643)

Other activities

6890 (4130)

TOTAL

26 096
(21 004)

In 2001, 54 state nature reserves received foreign grants. The main grants came from the Global Environmental Facility (68% of all the grants), the World Wide Fund for Nature (11%), and U.S. government agencies (10%).

Grants received from Russian sponsors amounted to 5,266,000 rubles (versus 7,782,000 rubles in 2000). The involvement of various types of sponsors is shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Russian sponsors' involvement in financing state nature reserves in 2001

Organization

Sum,
rubles

Industrial organizations

1684

Banks

27

Transport enterprises

308

Trade firms

95

Advertising agencies

49

Other organizations

690

Non-profit organizations

715

Individuals

1698

TOTAL

5266

There is no "typical" nature reserve in Russia since each reserve has its own profile and specifics. The indices given here are simply to satisfy our own statistical curiosity.

In 2001, the average annual budget of a reserve was around 3,665,000 rubles (versus 2,949,000 rubles in 2000). The reserves with the largest and smallest budgets in 2001 are given in Table 4.

Table 4. Reserves with largest and smallest budgets in 2001

Reserves with Largest Budgets

Reserves with Smallest Budgets

Name

Budget,
thousand rubles

Share
of Federal Funds,
%

Name

Budget,
thousand rubles

Share
of Federal Funds,
%

Teberdinsky

11498

62

Bogdinsko-Baskunchaksky

967

95

Laplandsky

10178

34

Dagestansky

1119

90

Yuzhno-Uralsky

8941

74

Polistovsky

1177

100

Yugansky

8770

29

Basegi

1235

70

Malaya Sos’va

8610

30

Nurgush

1261

98

Astrakhansky

8407

27

Denezhkin Kamen’

1280

76

Baikalo-Lensky

8065

81

Kaluzhskiye Zaseki

1286

91

Voronezhsky

7076

63

Bastak

1369

80

Baikalsky

6981

68

Nizhne-Svirsky

1441

79

Kavkazsky

6769

73

Mordovsky

1513

82

Of 95 reserves, 57 had budgets below average.

In 2001, 86 (versus 88 in 2000) reserves received money from the budgets and non-budgetary funds of federal bodies and municipal funds. The reserves with the most income from these sources are shown in Table 5. The regions that assisted their local nature reserves the most and least are shown in Table 6.

Table 5. Reserves with the most income from regional
and local budgets and non-budgetary funds in 2001

Reserve

Financing,
in thousand rubles

Share of the Budget,
%

Yugansky

5990

68

Malaya Sos'va

5953

69

Laplandsky

3832

38

Astrakhansky

3067

36

Verkhne-Tazovsky

2064

47

Putoransky

1356

47

Yuzhno-Uralsky

1249

14

Voronezhsky

1234

17

Volzhsko-Kamsky

1215

53

Zhigulevsky

1089

38

Table 6. Regions that provided the most and least financial support to MNR state nature reserves
from regional and local budgets and non-budgetary funds in 2001

Regions that Provided the most Support

Regions that Provided
the Least

Region

Sum,
thousand rubles

Share of Total Budget Region’s Reserves,
%

Region

Sum,
thousand
rubles

Khanty-Mansi Aut. Area

11943

69

Republic of Adygei

0

Murmansk Region

4675

 Republic of Mariy-El

0

Yamalo-Nenetsky Aut. Area

2345

 Pskov Region

0

Republic of Bashkortostan

1811

 Chukot Aut. Area

0

Astrakhan Region

3077

 Koryak Aut. Area

0

Samara Region

1089

38

Even Aut. Area

0

Voronezh Region

1609

 Ingush Republic

0

Khabarovsk Territory

1271

 Kaluga Region

3

Krasnoyarsk Territory

2432

 Penza Region

10

Republic of Tatarstan

1215

 Kirov Region

25

In 2001, 88 reserves (versus 85 in 2000) earned income independently. The reserves that earned the most are listed in Table 7.

Table 7. Reserves that earned the most independently in 2001

Reserve

Earnings,
rubles

Budget Share,
%

Poronaisky

4124

73

Laplandsky

2394

24

Astrakhansky

2182

26

Khronotsky

2149

80

Kavkazsky

1329

20

Yuzhno-Uralsky

1054

12

Chernye Zemli

727

30

Kivach

668

28

Bashkirsky

650

10

Nenetsky

648

14

In 2001, 54 reserves received foreign grants (versus 74 in 2000). The reserves with the highest income from foreign grants are listed in Table 8.

Table 8. Reserves that received the most support from foreign grants in 2001

Reserves

Foreign Grant Money,
thousand rubles

Budget Share,
%

Sikhote-Alinsky

2416

34

Bolshaya Kokshaga

2265

64

Teberdinsky

2981

26

Baikalsky

1929

26

Lazovsky

1600

27

Dzhygdzhursky

1759

32

Sokhondinsky

1912

39

Pinezhsky

1909

54

Baikalsky

1829

26

Bolshekhekhtsyrsky

2172

51

In 2001, 47 reserves received financial support from Russian sponsors (versus 56 in 2000). See Table 9.

Table 9. Reserves that received the most support from Russian sponsors in 2001

Reserves

Russian Grant Money,
thousand rubles

Budget Share,
%

Astrakhansky

885

11

Laplandsky

509

5

Sayano-Shushensky

451

8

Katunsky

384

12

Bureinsky

280

10

Bashkirsky

275

4

Vishersky

210

9

Koryaksky

210

12

Kuznetsky-Alatau

170

7

Nizhne-Svirsky

160

11

Overall, the financing of reserves in 2001, as compared to financing in 2000, can be characterized as follows:

  • Financing of reserves from the federal budget increased significantly (by 79%). This is the first time in recent years that the share of federal budget money in the total reserves budget increased (by 17%);
  • Financing from regional and local budgets and non-budgetary funds increased by 10%. However, the share of financing from this source in the total reserves budget decreased by 2.5%;
  • Reserves’ own earnings increased by 24%. However, there was a slight decrease of the budget share of reserves’ earnings (0.5%);
  • Foreign grants decreased significantly (39%). This is the first time in recent years that the share of foreign grant funds in the total budget decreased (by 13.3%);
  • Financing from Russian sponsors also decreased significantly (by 32%); the budget share also decreased (by 1.4%).

V. B. Stepanitsky,
Manager of Federal Projects,
WWF


*Average weighted $ rate was 1 USD=29.15 rubles in 2001; 1 USD=27.6 rubles in 2000

<< | contents | top | >>

 

OUR PUBLICATIONS


Nature Reserves and National Parks


ATTENTION!

2010 International Year of Biodiversity Website launched in Montreal!


TEEB
Russian Clearing-House mechanism on biological diversity

Volunteers Join Us

OUR BANNERS

Biodiversity

NAVIGATION

Home page
Site map (in Russian)

Subscribe to the BCC news
(in Russian):


<<<back

© 2000-2022 Biodiversity Conservation Center. All rights reserved